<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should We Keep Lawson?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawsonguru.com/2008/01/04/should-we-keep-lawson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawsonguru.com/2008/01/04/should-we-keep-lawson/</link>
	<description>Thought-Provoking Commentary for the Lawson Software Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:23:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Crandall</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawsonguru.com/2008/01/04/should-we-keep-lawson/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Crandall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawsonguru.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/does-it-make-sense-to-keep-lawson/#comment-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think many clients haven&#039;t implemented the HR Suite (including SEA and Process Flows) to automate much of their system.  I call it the giving birth syndrome where after the baby...they take it easy for a while and never get to &quot;Phase 2&quot;.  By implementing Self Service (Minimum should be Manager) and by utilizing Position Management &amp; Budgeting,  the Applicant Tracking Module (most likely without e-Recruiting) and utilizing Personnel Actions - all with integration via Process Flows - there is quite a decent system with adequate reporting tools and reports.  Couple it with MS Add-Ins and it can utilize interfaces from 3rd parties well, if that is the way you want to go.  Is it perfect - is anything perfect?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many clients haven&#8217;t implemented the HR Suite (including SEA and Process Flows) to automate much of their system.  I call it the giving birth syndrome where after the baby&#8230;they take it easy for a while and never get to &#8220;Phase 2&#8243;.  By implementing Self Service (Minimum should be Manager) and by utilizing Position Management &amp; Budgeting,  the Applicant Tracking Module (most likely without e-Recruiting) and utilizing Personnel Actions &#8211; all with integration via Process Flows &#8211; there is quite a decent system with adequate reporting tools and reports.  Couple it with MS Add-Ins and it can utilize interfaces from 3rd parties well, if that is the way you want to go.  Is it perfect &#8211; is anything perfect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

