Top Posts & Pages
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Thought-Provoking Commentary for the Lawson Software Community
That line comes back to me as I read about a client suing Lawson over a failed implementation.
I dunno, but this sure sounds like a pretty typical ERP implementation. But like a failed marriage, there is usually plenty of blame to go around–and, of course, no one willing to take it.
Several years ago, I helped mediate and ultimately dissolve what had become a toxic customer/vendor relationship. The unique aspect–for me–was that both the customer and the vendor wanted me involved in the settlement, since I had insight into both sides of their dispute. Both parties initially agreed to equally share the blame, and what could have ended up in a nasty courtroom battle was ultimately resolved fairly amicably.
What resonated then–but appears to be absent now in this case–was the mutual desire of both parties to end amiciably and move on. In other words: avoid the cost, lost productivity, and bad publicity associated with litigation.
Customer/vendor disputes are to be expected in some percentage of sales–human nature means that not everyone can be 100% satisfied. Therefore, involving the lawyers is not that uncommon. But what is uncommon–and ultimately so counter-productive–is litigation.
Here are some notable past ERP disputes:
Here are some excellent industry articles: